2020. 2. 16. 17:01ㆍ카테고리 없음
A physical mock-up of the new 16-seat twin-engine Bell 525. (Source: Bell Helicopter) Maestas says Bell designers complain about the number of clicks to accomplish anything in Enovia V6.
Nevertheless, he says it is more usable than Enovia LCA, the PDM software Bell uses with V5. Outstanding capabilities of V6 include searching by date, version, or release status. Designers also can search for parent assemblies in which each part or subassembly is used. It’s possible to search for parts in 3D space by specifying a zone, box, sphere, or offset volume around a part and see the context of the entire product.
Designers also can subscribe to parts or assemblies and be notified when they are changed. V6 performs well, according to Maestas.
Designers in India are finding no significant latency when opening drawings or models stored near Ft. Worth, Texas. In contrast, V5 customers report increasing lag times as designers get farther from the main database server. Maestas also pointed out shortcomings of the new product.
Tubing and harness tools are missing from the 2011 release. The Composite Workbench is “not robust,” he said.
Measure tools don’t work as well as they did in V5. And despite its power, the advanced search window sometimes behaves strangely. Cessna Latitude Craig Hull of Cessna Aircraft gave a presentation about how his company is using Catia V6 to design a new executive jet, the Citation Latitude. Like the Bell 535, the Latitude was supposed to be an all-new design. But shortly after the project started, executives decided to re-use the wing and empennage designs of an older model, the Citation Sovereign.
Because the Sovereign was designed in Catia V4 with updates in V5 and because the Sovereign is still in production with part changes occurring regularly, Cessna needs to keep its existing Catia V4 VPM system in production as the Latitude is being designed. It was not feasible to migrate all of Cessna’s historical data to V6 in time to support the Latitude’s development schedule.
Consequently, Cessna has to share CAD models among the V4, V5, and V6 versions of Catia. Thanks for taking the time to write the article about COE. I was not able to attend this year but the reports I have received show that it was a good event and people had a good level of discussion and education. I would like to elaborate on some of the points that you raised in your article so that people can understand the logic of where we are.
A number of the points really require an article by themselves but I will try to give the bare bones of the topics. The idea of moving to storing geometry in a database instead of part files came about from customer scenarios and large projects where users were wishing concurrent access to parts but then needing to duplicate data then resynchronize the results and understanding all the reasons that decisions were made. Although this is the method used by some very large organisations today, it was clear to the DS R&D team that there had to be a better way. Therefore the idea of using the database was investigated and prototyped before the acquisition of Matrix 1! The acquisition of the Matrix technology brought benefits that allowed enhanced scalability, remote location performance and integration with other PLM services.
Dirt Devil Express V6 Wet/dry Hand Vac
By the way CATIA V6 is not the 1st solution to store its model data in a database without file system. You reported Etienne’s comments about performance improvements, the scale of performance improvement is significant but many of these improvements in pure modelling performance will also be seen in the latest V5 releases because of the parallel development activities. The area where V6 can be significantly faster is in concurrent working, the huge assembly performance and aspects that combine a logical and physical view, e.g. Cabling, steelwork, systems design. You also mentioned that approaches that different customers are taking to V6, yes some customers are focused on getting the most from their V5 investment because it is a very good system, and probably the closest competitor to CATIA V6, some other customers have chosen to move to another system but there are also some very interesting companies that are moving to V6, like Jaguar Landrover and also companies using the parts of V6 that are not in V5 and mixing it with their V5 investment! An example of this is BMW. So there are all sorts of approaches that can be adopted that use migration and coexistence approaches.
As you highlighted, COE workshops were well attended and customers want to know more before they decide what to do. Our goal in the CATIA brand is share that knowledge as widely as possible for people who were not able to attend COE. Your article highlights the difference between V5 and V6 assembly constraint methods. As you mention, CATIA V5 uses a typical parametric definition of assembly constraints that normally allowed the positioning of parts and some level of logical connection for movement, these connections were normaly stored inside the “Product” document and defined the connections for a set of parts within a specific product. The limitation of this was that it did not convey any mechanical or manufacturing intent or the different views of the product during the design, manufacturing, test, servicing or disposal aspects of it’s lifecyle. Therefore it needed the downstream applications to redefine the connections, for example: o the stress guys needed to recreate all the connections, o the manufacturing people needed to recreate all the assembly information o Fastener, welding and gluing applications needed their own unique features o More complex kinematic simulations required the structure to be rebuilt.
Although users accepted to do these activities, (as they do in other solutions), it creates a mountain of rework, lifecycle management, “who is the master” questions that break the concept managed concurrent design. Therefore in V6 we have introduced the concept of Engineering Connections.
These features: o Have a richer definition of how parts relate to each other and what they can do. O Know which part is the fixed or moving part and with what type of behaviour. O Are free of product structure locking and the need to redefine free movement. O Can be be driven by a logical or functional view of the product. O Can be lifecycled, configured and have variants. The advantages of using Engineering connections is immediately clear to a mechanical engineer, or manufacturing or stress guy, as soon as you start to use CATIA V6, but it does mean that the user needs to move away from the “CAD glue” idea of being able to place a part using constraints that allow positioning rather than design intent.
This transition also has impacts when migrating from earlier versions because we may keep the positional information but it is almost impossible to know if the CATIA V5 assembly definition really represents the engineering definition the designer would want in V6. Later in the article, you highlight the differences between “save” in V5 and “propagate” in V6. These differences were specifically created to ensure that the use was more aware of the impact of what he was doing. V6 is heavily focused on concurrent working and therefore the impact “saving” work has on other people, processes and downstream activities is much more than just saving a document on your local disk and then sending it to the team as an attachment at a later time. The lifecycle, locking and ownership aspects of parts is pretty transparent to users and reflects the behaviour that people will be familiar with when working with a CAD plus PDM solution. You mention the Workspace in your article. The idea of the workspace came from the Smarteam days, and when the concept was then shared with RVI and they, rightly, said “that’s what we need!!” Since that time there have been a number of methodologies developed to perform that function and now there are some unique tools to do that in ENOVIA.
Essentially these are tools that allow users to perform design studies without impacting the global data set. The observation from Bell about the CATIA R2011 user interface and number of clicks has been massively improved in R2012 and R2012x and in the coming releases because it was absolutely not what we wanted. It should also be considered that what is being integrated inside CATIA V6 and ENOVIA V6 is significantly more than was available in ENOVIA LCA or CATIA V5, therefore it has taken real use cases to optimise the decision structure and user experience that is needed. Equally the piping, composite, electrical and other applications in V6 have been reinforced since to take advantage of the V6 architecture and the difference in data structure.
The process that you describe Cessna for migrating data from CATIA V4 to V6 is impacted by the configuration of their V6 environment. The environment that many of our users will see 1st is RACE. This environment is the default environment for the V6 Online, V6 PLM Express and full V6 world. Inside RACE there is the notion of projects, owners, public/private and a simple lifecycle model that understands where data has come from and who owns it. By selecting the correct person to bulk transfer the data and the appropriate maturity state for the data, the complexity you describe can be avoided. Although RACE is available for all the CATIA V6 type of activities, some customers will choose to implement a richer customisation that has behaviours suited to how they work. So I think the bullet points from Craig Hull are absolutely valid, but there some ways to make things easier and more predictable available in the solution today.
The sharing data with suppliers topic is a critical one and can be addressed via the V5/V6 coexistence approach, the sharing of 3D XML briefcases, hosting suppliers on an OEM’s V6 environment but I think it would be a separate article if you were agreeable? You rightly ask the question about where CATIA V6 will find its growth. The primary point about CATIA V6 is that it is NOT CATIA V5+1 in terms of coverage of the product definition process! Despite a massive reduction in the number of commercial products, in V6 compared to V5, the number of domains and activities covered is significantly greater. The key examples of this are in the systems area but there are other very significant areas that will be revealed in the future that increase the number of uses in existing customers and connect with new users in new customers.
Also the business model and accessibility of the solution, by using the V6 Online approach, means that more users can use CATIA for the projects that make sense without having to make major capital investments. For your information, the V6 Online service has been available since September 2011 and is the easiest and most flexible way to rent and use CATIA V6.
Regarding the easy to learn aspects of CATIA V6, this is an area that we really want to improve and make available to wider group of people without them having to commit to training classes that take them away from their real work. There are different aspects of CATIA V6 that can be mastered quite easily; 3D Live, Liveshape, Livecompose, Livesheetmetal etc plus the workbenches that are similar to many other feature based modellers but there are also more focused role based solutions that, even with the best tutorial in the world, will not make you a brilliant composite structure designer unless you know about the real life composite manufacture activity. As your article says, CATIA V5 users find it quite straight forward to move to CATIA. From a user interface perspective, there are different approaches depending on the product and role users are taking. For the creative designer there is the gesture and pen based approach, for the mechanical type of user there is the feature based approach and for the specialist users i.e. Class A designers, lofting engineers, composite designers, systems engineers there are mixtures of: o logical view (of a ply stack for example), o analysis windows (for device information) o On geometry feedback (for surface connection or curvature) That are focused at those specific roles and without them we know that real specialists cannot work.
An interesting view about using icons or gestures etc, is that it is much easier for a returning user to remember what to do from an icon based UI than it is to remember the gestures or additional options that a function has. Also it is much easier to clearly document, test and support an icon and option panel based interface than it is gestures that can vary by person, hardware, conflict with other gesture based applications.
Red Devil Express V6
Therefore we are making sure that we use the right approach for the right scenario where possible. The last point about connecting ENOVIA V6 with CATIA V5 may well be seen but it should not be confused with the advantages of a full V6 solution and the advantages in collaboration, performance, design and efficiency that go with it. If you have any comments or have additional questions then please let me know and I will be happy to reply. Kind regards Andy Reilly.
Cracked or original version: if you try to install cracked, try with this:. 1. Burn images to DVDs or use virtual DVD emulator to load DVDs. 2.
Insert DVD #3 into your drive and start installation of server staff. 3. Select DSLS and ENOVIA PLM Express Server. 4. When DSLS installs and licensing administration tool appears, log. into the server and grab Server ID (XXX-XXXXXXXX) and computer name.
5. Use keygen from SolidSQUAD folder on DVD #3 to generate license. for given id and name. 6. Enroll the license to the server. 7.
Continue installation of ENOVIA staff. 8. When Tomcat server for ENOVIA starts,log in to. with login PLMADM with password you. created.
9. Create users and projects and assign the necessary licenses to them.
10. On client machines, install CATIA clients from DVD #1 and DVD #2. and point them to the license server you set up before. 11. I tried installing v6r2012x in my system by procedure of, 1.installing SQL 2008R2 2.server client for enovia vpm installation then it popped up for online registration in enovia website. And i logged in using PLMADM as username and my personal password.
But it shows error of 'internal server error,error retrieving the requested page. Please contact administrator '. I have my latest 4.5 dot net and all other prerequisites. Somebody reply for my query.